“There is nothing to do but write
the truth.”
--Jack Kerouac
Sixty
years ago, on September 5, 1957, a novel was published that changed the face of
American literature, and with it much of American culture. That novel was On
the Road, by Jack Kerouac, a young writer from Lowell, Massachusetts, who
grew up in a French-Canadian working-class family and had been a football star
at Lowell High School and a promising athlete at Columbia.
Writing
in the New York Times, on September
5, Gilbert Millstein described Kerouac’s book as a “major novel...an authentic
work of art.” He went on to call On the Road, “the most
beautifully executed, the clearest and most important utterance yet made by the
generation Kerouac himself named years ago as ‘beat.’”
I
was nineteen years old when I read Millstein’s rave review. A less enthusiastic
one by David Dempsey appeared a few days later in the Times’ Sunday Book Review, as if the timid editors had gone too far
in allowing a positive appraisal of a novel that was destined to become one of
the most subversive in our literature and felt they had to correct Millstein’s
enthusiasm.
I
had not heard of Jack Kerouc and I didn’t know what the Beat Generation was.
The literature I was studying in college was pretty much canonical. But I raced
down to my friend Carl Apollonio, who owned the only bookstore in Brunswick,
Maine. Within a week I possessed a first
edition of On the Road. I should
have held onto that copy, instead of sharing it among my friends until it
disappeared, because today a first edition of On the Road is worth
between $7200 and $19,000 depending upon its condition. Kerouac’s own
manuscript of the novel, typed on a continuous roll of architectural drawing
paper, was sold fifteen years ago at auction by Christie’s for $2.4 million
dollars. Kerouac would have loved it that the winning bidder was James Irsay,
the owner of the Indianapolis Colts football team, whose comment upon taking
possession of the manuscript was, “I look on it as a stewardship. I don’t believe
you own anything.” In 2007, Kerouac’s original publisher Viking Press issued a
ground-breaking edition of On the Road, effectively reproducing the
initial scroll manuscript and, true to Kerouac’s wishes, reinserting the actual
names of people upon whom the characters were based.
On
the day I bought On the Road I sat down after dinner in my rented room
on Federal Street and didn’t stir until I had read the novel in its entirety. Describing the novel’s young and articulate,
if often manic, characters, narrator Sal Paradise, alias Jack Kerouac, says:
“They rushed down the street together, digging everything in the early way they
had, which later became so much sadder and perceptive and blank. But then they
danced down the street like dingledodies, and I shambled after as I’ve been
doing all my life after people who interest me, because the only people for me
are the mad ones, the ones who are mad to live, mad to talk, mad to be saved,
desirous of everything at the same time, the ones who never yawn or say a
commonplace thing, but burn, burn, burn like fabulous yellow roman candles
exploding like spiders across the stars...”
Imagine
the effect of this prose, indeed of a narrative in which Kerouac’s people are
racing from one corner of the country to the other in pursuit of experiences I
could only imagine, on a studious small town boy attending a staid New England
College. It was incendiary, to say the least. And while I’d learned to play on
piano the bebop that accompanied Dean and Sal and their friends from New York
to Denver, and from Denver to San Francisco, LA and Mexico City, I had no idea
that people like them or their chronicler Kerouac existed.
As
a budding literary critic, I grasped the relationship between Kerouac’s Beat
Generation and the equally alienated Lost Generation of the 1920s that Ernest
Hemingway, one of my heroes, had described in The Sun Also Rises, a
novel that had as much impact on its era as Kerouac’s had on mine. But the
Beats were less after “kicks,” as their critics alleged, than they were in
search of transcendence in the face of post-war materialism and Cold War
anxiety. Asked by his friend, novelist John Clellon Holmes, whose 1952 novel Go
was really the first Beat novel, to describe Beat sensibility, Kerouac replied:
“We
were a generation of furtives...with an inner knowledge there’s no use
flaunting on that level, a kind of beatness—I mean being right down to it, to
ourselves, because we all really know where we are—and a weariness with all the
forms, all the conventions of the world. So I guess you might say we’re a beat
generation.”
I
wish I could tell you that after closing the covers of On the Road, I
dropped out of college like some of my friends did, traveling to San Francisco
in pursuit of the “subterranean” culture whose members Kerouac characterized as
“hip without being slick, they are intelligent without being corny, they are
intellectual as hell. . . without being pretentious or talking too much about
it, they are very quiet, they are very Christlike.” But I didn’t. As much as I
may have wished to go “on the road” literally and metaphorically, I was
committed to my studies, and afraid, I see now, of taking any risks beyond the
purely academic.
Nevertheless,
On the Road had a deep impact on me as a writer, an impact that
reverberates to this day, when I am no longer nineteen but approaching eighty.
In fact, when I put down the novel after my first reading, I picked it up and
started reading it all over again. Then I thought about it for weeks, pondering
its meaning on long solitary October walks down the Mere Point Road in
Brunswick, the red and yellow leaves accompanying my mood of autumn melancholy.
For
all its surface elation, On the Road is at bottom a profoundly tragic
book. It’s a novel about a missing father who was never found, a childhood
never regained, a country whose innocence is forever lost. At the end of
Kerouac’s road, and Hemingway’s, too, instead of enlightenment for Sal and his
friends there is only the recognition of lost illusions and inevitable death.
“I’m
writing this book because we’re all going to die,” Kerouac said. “In the
loneliness of my life, my father dead, my brother dead, my mother faraway. . .
nothing here but my own tragic hands that once were guarded by a world, a sweet
attention, that now are left to guide and disappear their own way into the
common dark of all our death.”
Like
much of our finest fiction—U.S.A. and The Great Gatsby come to
mind—On the Road interrogates the fundamental American myth of
success, the viability of a life based on material values. For all their
seeming irresponsibility, Sal, Dean Moriarty (a character based on the legendary
Neal Cassady), and Carlo Marx (poet Allen Ginsberg), are committed to achieving
a higher consciousness and an authenticity of personhood and spiritual insight
that cut through the religious and political cant of Henry Luce’s “American
Century.”
For
this reason, more than for Sal or Dean or Carlo, who drank too much or took
drugs in order to “see God’s face,” who refused to work nine-to-five jobs, and
who flaunted conventions with their liberated or inter-racial sexual
expression--indeed, for the experimental brilliance of Kerouac’s “spontaneous
prose”—On the Road was viciously attacked by the established press and
marginalized by mainstream and academic critics. Literature, unlike
politicians, tells the truth; and sometimes the truths it reveals are
unpleasant. Yet, since its publication in 1957, On the Road has sold 5
million copies in the United States alone and continues to sell more than
100,000 copies a year. Like Salinger’s Catcher in the Rye, which was
once banned from the classroom, On the Road, is now taught as an
essential American text.
Along
with On the Road, Kerouac published nine other novels. Perhaps the most
achieved in terms of structure, language and the poignant evocation of his
childhood in Lowell are three books set in his hometown, Dr. Sax, Maggie
Cassidy, and Visions of Gerard. Kerouac also wrote movingly
about growing up in Lowell in his first novel, The Town and the City,
(1950) and his last book, the elegiac Vanity of Duluoz, published in
1968, a year before his death of alcoholism in St. Petersburg, Florida at the
age of 47. Kerouac was buried in Lowell on October 23, 1969. As he wrote in On
the Road, “I was going home in October. Everybody goes home in October.”
Turning
the pages of this book again, I rediscover my youth in Kerouac’s stunning
prose, with a voice as unique as Whitman’s or Henry Miller’s, and the
unremitting energy of his narrative, both so characteristically American. I see
myself and my circle of friends, aspiring writers all of us, electrified by a
novel, which beckoned us away from our textbooks, opening us to a world that
lay beyond classrooms and degrees, beyond jobs and the promise of suburban
respectability. In one way or another many of us eventually followed Kerouac’s
road to self-discovery; and that decision, in the words of another great New
England writer, “has made all the difference.”
Coda: The Scroll
I
was ten years old when Jack Kerouac began the journey, hitchhiking and by car
and bus, that would take him back and forth across America. And I was thirteen
when Kerouac sat down at his typewriter, on April 2, 1951, to begin writing an
account of those epic trips on eight sheets of tracing paper he would later
tape together to form the 120-foot “scroll” version of the novel that would be
published in 1957 by Viking Press as On the Road. He completed that
single-spaced draft version of the novel twenty days later, on April 22, 1951.
By
the time On the Road was published, six years later, I was two months
away from my twentieth birthday. Between the time Kerouac had begun work on the
scroll and the date of its book publication, I had read those sprawling
narratives by Thomas Wolfe—Look Homeward, Angel and Of Time and the
River—which had been an inspiration to Kerouac, especially in his first
novel, The Town and the City; I’d heard in person the great tenor
saxophonist Lester “Prez” Young and the bebop innovator Charlie “Bird” Parker,
both of whose lives and music inspired Kerouac and his Beat companions on the
road; and I’d become something of a jazz musician myself. I’d also heard and
begun to experiment with the “bop talk” that became a prevalent form of
communication among jazz musicians, black and white, and among many of the
literary and artistic bohemians of the time, and which found its way into both
the speech of the characters and the narrative of On the Road. By
that time, too, I’d read most of the key texts of Modernism, which had equally
inspired Kerouac, Allen Ginsberg and William Burroughs, later to be
characterized as the Beat Triumvirate, though Burroughs was older than Kerouac
and Ginsberg and never considered himself part of the Beat Generation.
Consequently,
as soon as I began reading On the Road I understood Kerouac’s cultural
frame of reference, though I had never read a word of either writer, nor had I
traveled further west than Pittsfield, Massachusetts. I knew the music he
referred to, and I had myself experienced those extraordinary moments when, as
he wrote, “the tenorman jumped down from the platform and stood in the crowd,
blowing around…”
So
much of that excitement came back to me as I read the scroll version, which in
its rawness, its lack of paragraphs and chapter breaks, sounds to me like what
Kerouac really wanted to write, what was burning inside of him to express in
incandescent images, whole exhalations of pure language--that "spontaneous
bop prosody" he strove to attain. Even as the young scholars and critics,
who have edited and introduced this long-needed authentic version of an
American classic, detail Kerouac’s painstaking revisions (including drafts of
the novel before he began the scroll), and the difficult editorial negotiations
during which the book’s handlers at Viking attempted to “manage and commodify
his wild book and Kerouac’s enthusiastic vulnerability and complicity in that
process,” they make clear to us that the scroll is the ur-text and should be
read as such. I agree with them. My experience of reading it is not unlike the one I had sixty years ago
when the Viking version of the novel blew my mind.
Encountering
recent scholarship like that which underpins the Scroll Edition of On
the Road and Joyce
Johnson’s definitive biography, The Voice
is All: The Lonely Victory of Jack Kerouac, one can’t help but be reminded
that the Beats played a crucial role in the last truly concerted avant-garde
movement in art and literature in the US. Action Painting/Abstract
Expressionism, bebop and hard bop, the dance of Merce Cunningham and Martha
Graham, the new theater, and the poetry of the Beats, Olson's Black Mountain
group, and the emerging New York School all came together, intermingled, and
fertilized each other, from 1947, when Kerouac first went on the road, to the
late 1950s, when On the Road and his other novels emerged, along with
Ginsberg’s HOWL and Burroughs’ Naked Lunch.
It was a heady time for the arts--arts that were also in opposition to the Cold War, to American materialism, the myths of family life and suburban respectability. We haven't experienced a total movement like that since, and we may never again because the literacy doesn't exist anymore, nor the material conditions. It was cheap to live in the East Village from 1947 to the early 60s, or in San Francisco or Venice Beach. The Bowery is now full of high-end hotels, restaurants and condos. People could live on next to nothing, get part time jobs, sell their work and essentially give their time over to making art. Now we are compelled to teach or to find other work that takes us away from art, while artists are being forced out of the cities and neighborhoods they once inhabited. With the loss of places to live and gather, the kind of community that the Beats created, lived in, and traveled to and from in SF, Venice Beach, Denver, New York, Mexico City, and LA no longer exists. This is a great loss, not only to art but to the creation and sustenance of the kind of transgressive culture a nation needs for its intellectual and imaginative growth, especially now in the world of Trump and the new Cold War he and his administration are creating. On the Road is therefore all the more poignant because it describes a radically new world just as it was coming into being, a culture and a time—an energy—we may never have again.
(First posted on Dispatches from the Poetry Wars, October 2017)
It was a heady time for the arts--arts that were also in opposition to the Cold War, to American materialism, the myths of family life and suburban respectability. We haven't experienced a total movement like that since, and we may never again because the literacy doesn't exist anymore, nor the material conditions. It was cheap to live in the East Village from 1947 to the early 60s, or in San Francisco or Venice Beach. The Bowery is now full of high-end hotels, restaurants and condos. People could live on next to nothing, get part time jobs, sell their work and essentially give their time over to making art. Now we are compelled to teach or to find other work that takes us away from art, while artists are being forced out of the cities and neighborhoods they once inhabited. With the loss of places to live and gather, the kind of community that the Beats created, lived in, and traveled to and from in SF, Venice Beach, Denver, New York, Mexico City, and LA no longer exists. This is a great loss, not only to art but to the creation and sustenance of the kind of transgressive culture a nation needs for its intellectual and imaginative growth, especially now in the world of Trump and the new Cold War he and his administration are creating. On the Road is therefore all the more poignant because it describes a radically new world just as it was coming into being, a culture and a time—an energy—we may never have again.
(First posted on Dispatches from the Poetry Wars, October 2017)